Stratégie proposée par Eekwibble
18
18
Average rating: |
4.4 |
Ratings: |
17 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
||||||||||
1 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
|
Niveau 1+ Script |
2 | 4.6 | 118 | 165
2:45
|
25+ | ||
2 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
Faster than others atm. +2-3 turns if you are put to sleep in round one, up to you if you just wanna restart or keep going script will handle it, so will still succeed either way.
|
Breed Niveau 1+ Script |
2 | 4.6 | 18 | 89
1:29
|
11+ | ||
3 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
This is a slightly modified version of Ilyssa'a suicide strat. Line 6 of the TDScript will need the '669hp' modifying down if using MPD instead of the Zep.
|
Niveau 1+ Script |
2 | 4.4 | 18 | 135
2:15
|
20 | ||
4 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
This is a fairly quick and efficient strategy, allowing your leveling pet a fairly safe trip through.
I have explored this with a few other dragonkin in place of the Emerald Proto-whelp, but for durability, I find the ubiquitous Emerald Powerhouse to be the best for this one so far as the secondary pet. Script thanks to NabuArat |
Niveau 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 | 9 | 105
1:45
|
14+ | ||
5 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
Considerably slower compared to the use of Nexus or Stormborn whelp, but if you are leveling pets, this one gives you two pet level-up slots instead of just one.
EDIT 05/24/2022: Very slight tweak for wording and efficiency but steps are still essentially the same. |
RNG Niveau 1+ |
2 | 4.3 | 8 | 245
4:05
|
38+ | ||
6 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
This is an amalgam of strategies from here and from YouTube.
Unfortunately, if Chrominius gets slept more than twice, this strat can get a little dicey. |
RNG Niveau 1+ |
2 | 0.0 | 1 | 175
2:55
|
26+ | ||
7 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
Niveau 1+ |
2 | 5.0 | 2 | 163
2:43
|
18 | |||
8 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
Should be faster than the Emerald Protowhelp strat, since you spend less time dreaming and more time lowering enemy health before you get to the Air Spirit
|
Niveau 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 | 3 | 270
4:30
|
35+ | ||
9 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
This is a modification of Kurasu#2861's strategy
Using Jeune dragonnet du Rêve in place of Proto-dragonnet émeraude I could have posed it in comment but I find it easier to have all of it with script in a strategy. I believe this to be slightly better for the Jeune dragonnet du Rêve's Flamme de soins is enough and makes the fight quicker, compared to Proto-dragonnet émeraude's going into Rêve d’émeraude vs the self healing last pet. Regarding breeds, I've set pet breeds as the one I used and that I tested the strategy with, I think those are the most suited but it can likely work with other breeds if you don't have the PP one. |
Breed Niveau 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 | 6 | 110
1:50
|
15+ | ||
10 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
So by request I threw together a strat that the 10% sleep chance hit doesn't affect, this is what I got. Not sure if there is a better second pet. Also this is not 100% tested so I am unsure if double unlucky crits on the second pet might break the strat. Happy for any suggestions. Currently 15-16 turns depending on life exchange.
|
Breed Niveau 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 | 1 | 105
1:45
|
14-16 | ||
11 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
RNG Niveau 1+ Difficile Script |
2 | 4.5 | 3 | 185
3:05
|
24+ | |||
12 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
I use an H/B IbP-W but it should work with H/H as well
|
RNG Niveau 1+ Script |
2 | 3.7 | 2 | 265
4:25
|
37+ | ||
13 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
Time: ~1:25
NOTE: Dragon féerique du Néant has to be S/S breed! NOTE: If you are stunned in Turn 1 start fight over! (25% chance) --> TD Script will quit the fight in that case! It's a fast strategy. Tested 11/12/2020 |
Breed RNG Niveau 1+ Script |
2 | 2.3 | 2 | 98
1:38
|
15+ | ||
14 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 5+
N'importe quelle mascotte
|
|
Niveau 5+ |
2 | 0.0 | 0 | 215
3:35
|
34+ | ||
15 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
Saintgabrial
|
Niveau 1+ |
2 | 0.0 | 0 | 173
2:53
|
25+ | ||
16 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
If you try to fail, and succeed, which have you done?
|
Niveau 1+ Script |
2 | 0.0 | 0 | 210
3:30
|
27+ | ||
17 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
"No sleeping" stategy, someone write TDscript please
|
Breed RNG Niveau 1+ |
2 | 0.0 | 0 | 127
2:07
|
17 | ||
18 |
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
|
Breed Niveau 1+ Script |
2 | 0.0 | 0 | 205
3:25
|
33 | |||
19 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 138
2:18
|
18 |
Ajout étape:
N'importe quelle mascotte de niveau 1+
Substitutes:
1 / 2
This is a slightly modified version of Ilyssa'a suicide strat. Line 6 of the TDScript will need the '669hp' modifying down if using MPD instead of the Zep.
Avant | Après | Gain xp | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ➜ | 13 | 5981 |
2 | ➜ | 13 | 6353 |
3 | ➜ | 14 | 6683 |
4 | ➜ | 14 | 6971 |
5 | ➜ | 14 | 7219 |
6 | ➜ | 15 | 7425 |
7 | ➜ | 15 | 7590 |
8 | ➜ | 16 | 7714 |
9 | ➜ | 16 | 7796 |
10 | ➜ | 17 | 7838 |
11 | ➜ | 17 | 7838 |
12 | ➜ | 18 | 7796 |
13 | ➜ | 19 | 7714 |
14 | ➜ | 19 | 7590 |
15 | ➜ | 20 | 7425 |
16 | ➜ | 20 | 7219 |
17 | ➜ | 21 | 6971 |
18 | ➜ | 22 | 6683 |
19 | ➜ | 22 | 6353 |
20 | ➜ | 23 | 5981 |
21 | ➜ | 23 | 5569 |
22 | ➜ | 24 | 5115 |
23 | ➜ | 25 | 3900 |
24 | ➜ | 25 | 1980 |
Chapeau de safari |
|
Friandise inférieure |
|
Friandise |
|
Haut-de-forme sombrelune |
|
Événement semaine bonus |
= |
Passage niveau 25 avec perte d'xp minimale |
|
= |
XP au-delà du niveau 25 en surplus |
|
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Ssssssswwwoooooossshhhhh
1
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.pardall
rédigé le 2020-12-03 12:15:14
UPDATE: Tried to kill him again and I'm not able anymore. It's very RNG dependant. (edited)
1
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.Ta
rédigé le 2021-04-30 17:23:53
1
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.trixiebink
rédigé le 2020-10-15 02:35:37
1
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.(OP) Eekwibble
rédigé le 2019-01-21 20:36:00
1
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.doomedcow
rédigé le 2018-08-21 14:12:32
2
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.(OP) Eekwibble
rédigé le 2018-08-21 15:44:14
I bet if you tried it another 8 times it would work every one of them, though. Two attempts isn't a great sample size.
3
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.Gráinne
rédigé le 2018-08-22 04:59:27
Personally, I wouldn't call anything under a 95% strat Reliable, maybe 99%. Tamer levelling strats are expected to fail so rarely that it's a statistical blip.
1
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.Gráinne
rédigé le 2018-08-23 13:52:52
1. Chrominius did not survive to face Whispertail
2. Needed Missile after Thunderbolt on PAS
3. Whispertail enters with >740, so doesn't die to SoP (3 times)
I could see my way round those deviations clearly enough, though perhaps a beginner wouldn't, and I would say this strat is reliable enough to post here, but is that reliable enough for an extra "Reliable" tag within the context of what people expect from this site, when the user has to compensate for RNG? A script would also need to compensate for these cases. That may be a conversation that needs to work itself out.
1
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.doomedcow
rédigé le 2018-08-27 13:00:37
2
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.Gráinne
rédigé le 2018-08-27 19:13:45
1
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.(OP) Eekwibble
rédigé le 2018-08-28 21:17:45
Sorry for my over-optimism. ;P
1
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.Gráinne
rédigé le 2018-08-29 07:00:54
I completely understand how tempting it is to feel that your strat is great when you've just worked it out. Oh yeah, I understand that very well. :)
And the issue affects more than just you; I raised it in the Discord well before I saw this. I think long-term, it might be better to tag strats as "Reliable" based on high number of votes based on stars received, or by the number of people making reports with success on their first tries. Thing is, if you don't actually math it out, it takes a LOT of attempts to determine the reliability of a strat - I'd say about 100.
And then we have the question: how reliable do people expect a strat to be, to be tagged "Reliable" here? I expect all strats here to be above 90%, except challenge strats with built-in RNG. So is "Reliable" 99%? 99.9%?
The conversation needs to work itself out. I trust Aranesh and the community to find a good answer. Thanks for participating contructively. :)
1
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.Gráinne
rédigé le 2018-08-29 07:31:13
If my 90% quick survey is right, then your strat fits right in with the rest - neither "Reliable" nor "RNG". I'd save "RNG" for those Family strats where it is really needed.
1
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.(OP) Eekwibble
rédigé le 2018-08-29 16:31:01
So someone posts a strat that is almost there but not quite 100% reliable and 11 people find the flaw before the kink is ironed out.
Well, there's no way to balance it between 5-star votes, first time success subs and 'Reliable' tags that I can see, but, I'll leave it in your capable hands.
1
Vous devez être connecté pour voter.Zafferg
rédigé le 2018-08-24 06:03:06
Nouveau Commentaire :